Since 2010, the Global Law Experts annual awards have been celebrating excellence, innovation and performance across the legal communities from around the world.
posted 3 hours ago
Understanding the notice period in Finland is essential for every employer and employee navigating the end of an employment relationship. Finland’s Employment Contracts Act (55/2001) sets out mandatory minimum notice periods that vary by length of service and by which party initiates the termination, and recent legislative changes have lowered the dismissal threshold while expanding fixed‑term contract flexibility, meaning more terminations are now being processed than at any point in the past decade. This guide consolidates the exact statutory tables, explains how to deliver notice so it is legally effective, addresses fixed‑term contract limits, and clarifies when immediate cancellation is permitted.
Whether you are an HR manager preparing a dismissal, an employee drafting a resignation, or in‑house counsel reviewing contract clauses, the practical checklists and sample wording below will help you act with confidence.
The Employment Contracts Act, Chapter 6, Sections 2 and 3, prescribes default notice periods that depend on the continuous duration of the employment relationship and on whether the employee or the employer initiates termination. These statutory periods apply unless a collective agreement (TES) or the individual employment contract provides for different, but lawful, periods.
| Duration of employment | Employee’s notice period | Employer’s notice period |
|---|---|---|
| Up to 1 year | 14 days | 14 days |
| More than 1 year, up to 4 years | 14 days | 1 month |
| More than 4 years, up to 8 years | 1 month | 2 months |
| More than 8 years, up to 12 years | 1 month | 4 months |
| More than 12 years | 1 month | 6 months |
Where this comes from: Employment Contracts Act (55/2001), Chapter 6, Sections 2–3, Finlex English translation; practical breakdown at Työsuojelu, Periods of notice.
Two rules constrain what parties may agree to contractually. First, a notice period agreed in the employment contract may not exceed six months. Second, the employer’s notice period may never be shorter than the employee’s. If the agreed employer notice period is shorter than the statutory minimum, the statutory period applies instead. These ceilings are mandatory, a contractual clause that exceeds six months or that shortens the employer’s period below the employee’s is void to that extent.
The Employment Contracts Act (55/2001, as amended) is the primary statute governing termination of employment in Finland. It covers notice periods, grounds for dismissal, cancellation rights, trial‑period rules, and the employer’s duty to offer alternative work before resorting to redundancy. The Act is supplemented by the Working Hours Act, the Annual Holidays Act, and numerous sector‑specific collective agreements.
The statutory notice periods in the table above are default rules. A nationally binding collective agreement (työehtosopimus, or TES) may set different notice periods, either longer or shorter, for the sector it covers. Where a generally applicable TES exists, its terms override the statutory defaults for all employers in that sector, whether or not the employer belongs to the signatory employers’ association. In practice, many TES agreements adopt the statutory periods without change, but some, particularly in construction, healthcare, and retail, prescribe modified timelines. Always check the applicable TES before relying solely on the Act.
Where this comes from: Employment Contracts Act, Chapter 6, Section 1, Finlex; Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment (TEM) guidance, TEM Employment Contracts Act.
Getting the notice period in Finland right is only half the challenge. The other half is ensuring that the notice is delivered in a manner that will withstand scrutiny if a dispute arises. The Employment Contracts Act, Chapter 9, Section 4 provides that notice of termination must be delivered to the other party personally. If personal delivery is not possible, the notice may be sent by letter or electronically, in which case it is deemed to have been received on the seventh day after sending.
This distinction matters enormously for calculating the start date of the notice period. When notice is handed over in person, the notice period begins the day after receipt. When notice is sent by post or email, the statutory presumption is that it arrives on the seventh day, meaning the notice period does not begin until the day after that deemed receipt date.
Employers planning a dismissal should follow a structured process to minimise litigation risk:
If personal delivery is impossible, for instance, if the employee is on extended leave or unreachable, send the notice by registered post and by email (with read‑receipt enabled). Document both transmissions. Under the statutory presumption, the notice is deemed received seven days after sending, but retaining evidence of posting and email delivery strengthens the employer’s position if the employee later disputes receipt.
An employee resigning should likewise deliver the resignation in writing and in person whenever feasible. While Finnish law does not prescribe a mandatory format for a resignation letter, written notice protects both parties by creating an unambiguous record of the termination date and the applicable notice period.
Below is a sample resignation letter that an employee can adapt. It is deliberately concise, Finnish practice favours clarity over length.
Sample resignation letter:
To: [Employer’s name / HR department]
From: [Employee’s full name]
Date: [Date of delivery]
I hereby give notice of termination of my employment contract. My last working day, taking into account the applicable notice period of [14 days / 1 month], will be [calculated end date].
I request written confirmation of receipt of this notice and of my final working day.
Yours sincerely,
[Signature and printed name]
If the employee sends the resignation by email, enabling a read receipt and following up with a physical copy is recommended. The employee should retain a copy of the sent email, including headers, and any delivery confirmation.
A fixed‑term employment contract ends automatically when the agreed period expires or the agreed work is completed, without any notice period being required. This is a fundamental distinction from indefinite (permanent) contracts, where the notice‑period rules described above always apply.
Outside of the agreed end date, a fixed‑term contract can only be terminated before its expiry in three circumstances:
Unilateral termination of a fixed‑term contract without grounds exposes the terminating party to liability for damages equal to the pay the other party would have received for the remaining contract term. This makes it critical for employers using fixed‑term arrangements to draft precise termination clauses at the outset.
Where this comes from: Employment Contracts Act, Chapter 6, Section 1, Finlex; InfoFinland, End of employment.
Finnish law draws a sharp distinction between terminating an employment contract (with notice) and cancelling it (immediate effect, no notice period). Cancellation is the most drastic step available and is governed by Chapter 8 of the Employment Contracts Act.
Either the employer or the employee may cancel the contract with immediate effect, but only if there is an extremely weighty reason that makes it unreasonable to require the relationship to continue even for the duration of a notice period. The threshold is deliberately high. Examples that Finnish courts have accepted include serious violence or threats, theft or fraud, gross insubordination, and sustained intoxication at work posing safety risks. Mere poor performance, personality conflicts, or ordinary negligence do not meet the standard.
During a trial period (koeaika), which may last up to six months under the Employment Contracts Act, Chapter 1, Section 4, either party may cancel the contract without notice and without stating grounds. However, cancellation during the trial period may not be based on discriminatory or otherwise improper reasons. If the employee believes the trial‑period cancellation was discriminatory, the burden shifts to the employer to demonstrate a legitimate, non‑discriminatory reason.
An employer who cancels without meeting the “extremely weighty reason” threshold faces a claim for unfair dismissal. The employee may seek compensation of up to 24 months’ pay (or up to 30 months’ pay for an employee representative). To reduce exposure, employers should document the following before cancelling:
Where this comes from: Employment Contracts Act, Chapter 8, Sections 1 and 3; Chapter 12, Section 2, Finlex; Työsuojelu.
While the statutory table sets the floor, many employees are covered by a collective agreement (TES) that modifies the notice period in Finland for their sector. In the commercial sector, for example, the applicable TES closely mirrors the statutory periods. In healthcare, certain TES agreements prescribe a two‑month employee notice period for senior staff after eight years of service, longer than the statutory one month. In technology and consulting, some TES agreements allow a three‑month mutual notice period to be agreed in individual contracts.
Regardless of what the TES or the individual contract says, two hard ceilings apply:
If you encounter a contractual clause requiring, say, a 12‑month notice period, that clause is void to the extent it exceeds six months. The practical effect is that the notice period is capped at six months, and the excess portion is unenforceable. Industry observers note that overly long notice clauses are sometimes used as de facto non‑compete mechanisms, a practice that Finnish courts have consistently rejected.
When drafting or reviewing employment contracts, the following notice‑period clause provides clear, enforceable terms:
“The notice period for termination of this employment contract shall be [X days/months] for the Employee and [Y days/months] for the Employer, provided that these periods comply with the minimum periods prescribed by the Employment Contracts Act (55/2001) and the applicable collective agreement. Notice shall be delivered in writing to the other party personally; where personal delivery is not possible, notice shall be sent by registered post and by email, and shall be deemed received on the seventh day after dispatch.”
In any later proceeding, the party who gave notice bears the burden of proving it was delivered. Best‑practice evidence includes:
If an employee believes their dismissal was unlawful, for example, because the employer failed to follow the correct notice period in Finland, did not state proper grounds, or cancelled the contract without an extremely weighty reason, the dispute is typically resolved through one of three channels.
First, many collective agreements provide for negotiation between the employee (or their union representative) and the employer before any formal proceedings. Unions such as PAM and YTN play an active role in representing members at this stage.
Second, if negotiation fails, the employee may file a claim in the general district court (käräjäoikeus). There is no specialised employment tribunal in Finland, employment disputes are heard by ordinary courts. The employee must generally bring the claim within two years of the termination date, though some TES agreements impose shorter time limits for initiating the negotiation process.
Third, remedies for unfair dismissal typically consist of compensation rather than reinstatement. The Employment Contracts Act, Chapter 12, Section 2 provides for compensation of between 3 and 24 months’ pay (up to 30 months for employee representatives), depending on the severity of the violation, the employee’s age, length of service, and prospects for re‑employment. In cancellation cases that fall short of the “extremely weighty reason” threshold, the employer may also be liable for pay for the notice period that should have been observed.
Where this comes from: Employment Contracts Act, Chapter 12, Sections 1–2, Finlex; PAM, Notice periods; YTN employment relationship guide.
Finland’s notice‑period framework is structured but detail‑sensitive. Employee notice periods range from 14 days to one month; employer periods range from 14 days to six months, scaling with the length of the employment relationship. The notice must be delivered personally whenever possible, and deemed receipt after seven days applies to postal and electronic delivery. Fixed‑term contracts generally end without notice at their expiry, but early termination outside the agreed terms triggers damages liability. Immediate cancellation is reserved for extreme cases and carries significant litigation risk if the threshold is not met. In every case, the applicable collective agreement should be checked first, as it may modify the statutory defaults.
For tailored advice on structuring notice clauses, managing a dismissal process, or responding to an unfair dismissal claim, find a Commercial Agreements lawyer in Finland through Global Law Experts.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Pekka Kähkönen at LexAuctor Ltd, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
