Since 2010, the Global Law Experts annual awards have been celebrating excellence, innovation and performance across the legal communities from around the world.
posted 14 minutes ago
Filing a MiCA NCA application in the Netherlands is now one of the most critical regulatory milestones for any crypto‑asset service provider (CASP) seeking to operate lawfully across the European Union. With Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA) fully in force and the Dutch supervisory split between the Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) and De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) now operational, applicants face a complex but navigable pathway from readiness to regulatory decision. This guide maps every stage of that pathway from preliminary legal triage through to EU passporting so that compliance teams, founders and CFOs can move with confidence.
This page is designed for corporate leadership, in‑house legal counsel, compliance officers, and CFOs at virtual‑asset service providers, crypto exchanges, wallet providers, and token issuers who need to prepare, file, and track a CASP licence or notification with the AFM.
A numbered step‑by‑step process covering each phase of the AFM submission; a clear mapping of AFM versus DNB responsibilities; a documents checklist ready for download; statutory timelines and fee guidance; common pitfalls to avoid; and a post‑licence obligations briefing including EU passporting under Article 65.
The Netherlands has divided MiCA supervisory responsibilities between two competent authorities. The AFM is the lead NCA for CASP authorisations and notifications: it processes applications, conducts conduct‑of‑business supervision, and publishes the CASP register. DNB retains specific prudential responsibilities, including assessments of qualifying holdings and acquisitions, as well as certain prudential and anti‑money‑laundering cooperation tasks. Understanding this split before you begin drafting your application is essential submitting material to the wrong authority or omitting a parallel DNB notification is among the most common early‑stage errors.
| Authority | Primary Responsibilities under MiCA |
|---|---|
| AFM | CASP licence processing, conduct‑of‑business supervision, whitepaper review, CASP register publication, cross‑border notifications |
| DNB | Prudential assessments, qualifying‑holding/acquisition reviews, AML supervisory cooperation, certain token‑specific capital checks |
Before diving into the numbered steps, it is important to determine the correct filing route. Firms that are not already authorised as credit institutions or e‑money institutions must apply for a full Article 63 authorisation. Entities that already hold an appropriate EU financial‑services licence (e.g., credit institution, investment firm) may instead follow the lighter‑touch Article 60 notification procedure. The steps below focus on the full Article 63 authorisation route, which applies to the majority of CASP applicants seeking a Netherlands crypto licence.
Confirm which crypto‑asset services and activities your firm intends to provide custody, exchange, transfer, order execution, placement, advisory, portfolio management, or any combination. Map each service to the relevant MiCA definitions and determine whether your products include asset‑referenced tokens (ARTs), e‑money tokens (EMTs) or other crypto‑assets, because the applicable capital, whitepaper and prudential rules differ materially by category. A precise scope statement prevents costly amendments later in the process.
The AFM offers a pre‑scan or preliminary dialogue for prospective applicants. According to the AFM step‑plan (stappenplan), firms should request an early technical call to discuss their business model, planned service scope, and readiness status before submitting a formal application. This early engagement can surface potential blockers such as an unsuitable legal structure or unclear product perimeter and set realistic expectations for the AFM’s processing timeline. Access the pre‑scan request through the AFM’s dedicated crypto‑parties portal.
MiCA requires that a CASP’s registered office and place of effective management be situated in the Member State where authorisation is sought. For the Netherlands, this means the firm must be incorporated under Dutch law (typically a B.V. or N.V.) and demonstrate that strategic decisions are genuinely taken in the Netherlands, with at least some directors resident in the EU. The AFM will verify articles of association, Chamber of Commerce registration, and evidence of a genuine Dutch operational presence. Mere brass‑plate arrangements will not satisfy the requirements.
All members of the management body must meet MiCA’s fit‑and‑proper requirements. Prepare detailed CVs, criminal‑record certificates (certificates of good conduct), proof of relevant knowledge and experience, declarations of time allocation, and a governance matrix showing reporting lines. The AFM examines competence, integrity, and independence. Gaps in documentation particularly missing foreign criminal‑record checks are among the most frequent causes of completeness queries.
Disclose the full ownership chain up to the ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs), including source‑of‑funds evidence for all shareholders above qualifying‑holding thresholds. Where a natural or legal person intends to acquire or increase a qualifying holding in a CASP, DNB must be notified and will conduct its own assessment. Timeliness is critical: failing to align the DNB qualifying‑holding notification with the AFM application can delay the entire process. Include clear ownership diagrams and signed beneficial‑ownership declarations.
MiCA mandates robust AML/CFT measures aligned with EU anti‑money‑laundering legislation and the Dutch national transposition of Directive 2015/849. Prepare and submit: a board‑approved AML policy, a documented firm‑wide risk assessment (FATF‑aligned), CDD and enhanced‑CDD procedures, transaction‑monitoring rules, suspicious‑activity reporting procedures, record‑keeping policies, and evidence of FIU cooperation channels. The AFM expects these documents to be operationally embedded not merely drafted on paper.
Depending on the services and token types involved, MiCA sets minimum own‑funds requirements typically the higher of a fixed euro amount or a percentage of relevant income metrics. Prepare audited financial statements, capital adequacy calculations, liquidity projections, and evidence of liquid‑asset buffers. Where issuance of ARTs or EMTs is in scope, additional reserve‑asset and redemption requirements apply. Present clear calculations referenced to the applicable MiCA Articles.
The AFM expects applicants to demonstrate alignment with EU digital operational resilience requirements. Compile and submit: a recent independent penetration‑test report, SOC 2 or equivalent assurance reports, an incident‑response plan, a business‑continuity plan, a disaster‑recovery playbook, and evidence of third‑party ICT risk management. Code audits for smart contracts or custody protocols should also be included where relevant.
If the application covers custody or administration of crypto‑assets, provide detailed evidence of your hot‑ and cold‑wallet architecture, asset‑segregation mechanisms, multi‑signature or MPC key‑management arrangements, insurance coverage (if any), and contractual frameworks governing client assets. The AFM will verify that client crypto‑assets are ring‑fenced from the firm’s own assets and from claims of the firm’s creditors. Include architectural diagrams and third‑party audit letters.
Assemble the full evidence pack mapped to each applicable MiCA Article. Where the firm intends to issue or offer crypto‑assets to the public, a compliant crypto‑asset whitepaper must be prepared. The whitepaper must contain prescribed disclosures issuer information, rights and obligations, underlying technology, risk factors, and environmental impact and must carry a clear disclaimer that it has not been approved by any competent authority. Use the downloadable MiCA CASP application checklist (Netherlands) to ensure no document is overlooked.
Once every document is collated and quality‑checked, submit the application package via the AFM’s dedicated CASP notification and application portal. The AFM will conduct an initial completeness check. Applications that are manifestly incomplete may be returned without entering the formal assessment window. Ensure that all annexes, translations (where required), and signatures are in order before uploading.
Under MiCA, the AFM has 25 working days to acknowledge receipt and assess completeness. If additional information is needed, the AFM may request it within the first 20 working days of the assessment period, at which point the statutory clock is suspended until the applicant responds. Once the application is deemed complete, the AFM has 40 working days to issue a draft decision. Respond to any clarification or completeness requests as promptly as possible delays on the applicant’s side extend calendar time significantly. Keep a response log that tracks every AFM query, your response date, and evidence provided.
After the AFM grants authorisation, it notifies ESMA for inclusion in the EU‑wide CASP register. If you intend to provide services in other Member States, the cross‑border notification under Article 65 is triggered: the home NCA communicates the details to the host‑state authorities, and the CASP may begin operations in the host state upon communication or, at the latest, within 15 calendar days. This EU passporting mechanism is one of MiCA’s most significant commercial advantages.
How Global Law Experts supports applicants: Global Law Experts connects organisations with experienced crypto‑licensing professionals across the Netherlands who understand both the AFM’s procedural expectations and DNB’s prudential requirements. From pre‑scan preparation through to post‑licence compliance, the network provides practical, jurisdiction‑specific guidance to accelerate time‑to‑decision.
The table below provides a detailed breakdown of supervisory responsibilities. Use it as a reference when determining which authority to engage at each stage of your MiCA NCA application in the Netherlands.
| Topic | AFM | DNB | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASP licence / notification processing | Lead authority receives and assesses all Article 63 applications and Article 60 notifications | Not the licensing authority for CASPs | Applications are filed exclusively with the AFM |
| Prudential capital / token classification | Conduct‑of‑business rules; monitors compliance with own‑funds requirements | Prudential assessments for ART/EMT issuers; reserve‑asset reviews | Coordination between AFM and DNB required for issuers |
| Acquisitions / qualifying holdings | May request ownership evidence during CASP application review | Conducts formal qualifying‑holding assessments | DNB notification must run in parallel with AFM application |
| AML supervisory cooperation | AML conduct supervision for CASPs | AML prudential cooperation; FIU liaison on certain matters | Both authorities cooperate; primary AML supervision rests with AFM for CASPs |
| Register publication | Publishes and maintains the Dutch CASP register; notifies ESMA | Not responsible for CASP register | ESMA consolidates EU‑wide register entries |
Before preparing a submission, applicants should verify that they can satisfy each of the following core requirements set out in MiCA and enforced by the AFM. A failure in any single area can result in a refusal or significant delay.
Applicants should cross‑reference each requirement against the specific MiCA Articles (in particular Articles 62, 63, 65 and 68) and note where the AFM applies additional national emphasis for example, enhanced scrutiny of the Dutch AML risk assessment and governance structures.
A complete AFM CASP application requires a substantial and carefully organised evidence pack. Global Law Experts has prepared a downloadable template pack the Netherlands MiCA CASP application checklist GLE template pack available in XLSX and PDF formats. The pack includes: a template applicant questionnaire, an evidence table mapping each document to the applicable MiCA Article, a sample whitepaper checklist, a template organisation chart, a management CV checklist, an IT security evidence list, and an AML policy checklist.
As a quick reference, the top twelve documents required for most applications are:
MiCA prescribes clear deadlines for the NCA assessment process. Once an application is submitted, the AFM has 25 working days to confirm receipt and assess completeness. If additional information is required, the AFM must request it within the first 20 working days of the assessment period; the statutory clock is suspended from the date of the information request until the applicant responds. After the application is deemed complete, the AFM has 40 working days to reach a draft decision. In practice, the calendar time from first contact to final decision can be significantly longer when pre‑scan engagement, information‑request cycles, and DNB parallel reviews are factored in. Industry observers expect that well‑prepared applicants who engage the AFM pre‑scan early and submit fully complete packs may achieve total timelines of approximately four to six months.
The AFM charges administrative fees for processing CASP applications. The exact fee schedule is published on the AFM website and may be updated periodically. Applicants should consult the AFM’s requirements and licences pages for the current fee amount before budgeting. Beyond regulator fees, firms should budget for external costs including legal advisory, compliance consulting, IT security audits, and (where applicable) independent financial audits. These external costs vary materially by scope and complexity verify with procurement.
Obtaining the CASP authorisation is not the finish line it is the starting gate for ongoing regulatory compliance. Once authorised, the firm must maintain compliance with all MiCA conduct and prudential requirements, submit periodic reports to the AFM, keep AML controls current, and cooperate with both AFM and DNB on supervisory requests.
For cross‑border operations, Article 65 of MiCA establishes the EU passporting mechanism. The CASP notifies the AFM of its intention to provide services in another Member State. The AFM then communicates the relevant details to the host‑state NCA and ESMA within a prescribed period. The CASP may begin providing services in the host state upon receipt of that communication or, at the latest, 15 calendar days after the notification. This mechanism allows a single Dutch MiCA licence to serve as a gateway to the entire EU single market a significant commercial advantage that makes the Netherlands an attractive jurisdiction for initial MiCA NCA application.
Ongoing obligations also include ESMA register updates, consumer‑protection compliance, AML/CFT cooperation with foreign FIUs, and adherence to any level‑2 delegated and implementing acts published by the European Commission. A MiCA post‑licence compliance calendar is an essential tool for managing these obligations.
Securing a MiCA NCA application in the Netherlands requires disciplined preparation, a clear understanding of the AFM vs DNB supervisory split, and a meticulously organised evidence pack. Your immediate next steps should be: (1) run a legal triage to define your service perimeter and applicable MiCA Articles; (2) request an AFM pre‑scan to identify potential blockers early; and (3) download the checklist and begin mapping every required document to the relevant Article. Global Law Experts has deep experience connecting applicants with crypto‑licensing professionals across the Netherlands who have guided numerous CASP filings from initial scoping through to successful AFM authorisation and EU‑wide passporting.
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
