Quick search
CTRL+K
Quick search
CTRL+K
Since 2010, the Global Law Experts annual awards have been celebrating excellence, innovation and performance across the legal communities from around the world.
posted 5 months ago
Image by freepik
Image alt text: Various social media platform logos
The Canadian Federal Government has enacted the Digital Services Tax (DST), a contentious amendment intended at reforming the country’s tax structure and ensuring that multinational digital businesses contribute a fair part to the Canadian economy. While the tax is projected to raise billions of dollars in revenue, critics fear that it would strain Canada’s trade agreements.
The DST, which was first suggested during the Liberal Party’s 2019 election campaign, was delayed as the government sought an international agreement through the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). However, despite extensive talks, no settlement was reached. On June 28, 2024, the federal government issued an Order in Council (OIC) to enact the Digital Services Tax Act, which had previously gained royal assent on June 20, 2024.
The press secretary for Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, Katherine Cuplinskas, highlighted Canada’s continued support for a cooperative international strategy to tax multinational digital corporations. “Canada’s priority and preference has always been a multilateral agreement, and Ottawa still hopes a deal can be struck in the near future,” said Cuplinskas. “Unfortunately, despite best efforts, repeated deadlines to reach an international agreement have come and gone.”
Multinational digital companies’ earnings in Canada are subject to a 3% tax under the DST. Companies must make more than CA$1.1 billion in worldwide revenue and more than CA$20 million in Canadian revenue annually in order to be eligible. The DST adds another level of complication for affected businesses since, in contrast to other taxing schemes, it applies retroactively to revenue collected since January 1, 2022.
Companies that often evade paying certain taxes in the regions in which they operate but do not have a physical presence, such as Meta, Alphabet, Facebook, and Amazon, are the explicit targets of this tax. The government hopes to solve a gap in the conventional corporation tax system, which has had difficulty adapting to the demands of the modern digital economy, by taxing these earnings.
It is anticipated that the DST will bring in a substantial amount of money for the federal government. In 2023, the Parliamentary Budget Office projected that the measure would generate approximately CA$7 billion over a five-year period. A much more cautious forecast of CA$5.9 billion in revenue between 2024 and 2029 was provided by the government budget for 2024.
The DST’s proponents see it as an essential step in updating Canada’s tax code and guaranteeing fair taxes for online businesses. According to Cuplinskas, the program is in line with Canada’s larger goal of halting the worldwide “race to the bottom” in company tax rates. “Canada strongly supports international efforts to ensure that all corporations, including the world’s largest corporations, pay their fair share,” she stated.
The DST has drawn criticism for its potential effects on Canada’s international trade relationships, notwithstanding its potential budgetary gains. Unilateral digital taxes are viewed by many nations as punitive measures that may lead to trade disputes or retaliatory levies. Citing unjust targeting of American IT firms, the United States, in particular, has voiced objection to comparable tariffs levied by other nations.
While acknowledging these concerns, the federal government insists that the DST is a short-term solution meant to bridge a crucial gap until an international agreement is established.
The government of Canada is still optimistic that a multilateral agreement under the OECD framework will eventually be achieved as it proceeds with the DST’s implementation. Meanwhile, the DST demonstrates Canada’s will to balance foreign diplomacy with economic concerns while modifying its tax system to reflect the changing digital economy.
According to the Canadian Federal Government, the Biden administration is working harder to oppose Canada’s Digital Services Tax (DST), which targets major foreign digital services firms. The government has said that it is still in close communication with its American counterparts.
One noteworthy development is that, in accordance with the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) has formally asked Ottawa for dispute settlement discussions. In a formal statement issued on August 30, 2024, U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai emphasized the United States’ opposition to unilateral digital services tariffs that it views as discriminatory. Tai emphasized, “The United States opposes unilateral digital service taxes that discriminate against U.S. companies,” expressing a long-standing worry about how the Canadian tax would affect American businesses.
Targeting international Big Tech companies that make significant profits from Canadian customers, the Digital Services Tax is a three percent charge. In Canada, the tax requires certain businesses to pay a percentage of their earnings. According to U.S. officials, this action disproportionately impacts American corporations since it primarily targets American-based, internationally-dominating businesses. This was emphasized by Tai, who deemed the tax unfair and in violation of Canada’s obligations under international trade accords. The tax violates duties to avoid treating U.S. firms less favourably than their Canadian competitors, she said specifically.
In order to develop a single worldwide framework for taxing digital services, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) spearheaded international discussions when Canada’s Liberal government proposed the DST. The United States and other stakeholders have criticized Canada for enacting the tax before achieving a wider international agreement, arguing that it might cause disruptions to trade and the economy. Earlier in the week of August 26, 2024, Katherine Tai met with Mary Ng, Canada’s Minister of International Trade, in Washington, where these concerns were reaffirmed.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, a Canadian government official said Ottawa was not shocked nor concerned by the U.S. move to elevate the matter under CUSMA, expressing confidence in Canada’s legal position. The spokesman stated that trade commitments were taken into consideration when designing the tax and that Canada is ready to defend its stance during discussions.
According to CUSMA regulations, the United States may request a dispute settlement panel to escalate the issue if the two nations are unable to address their concerns within 75 days of the consultation request. Such a tribunal would investigate the matter and perhaps render legally enforceable rulings, raising the stakes in the continuing conflict.
The results of these conversations will probably have wider ramifications for worldwide debates on equitable taxes in the digital age as well as for economic ties between the United States and Canada. A complicated negotiating procedure is anticipated as both countries seem entrenched in their ways. The return of President Trump is an additional complicating factor.
In order to make sure that big multinational firms that operate in the digital economy pay their fair share of taxes, some countries have put policies in place to tax their revenues. With the introduction of its Digital Services Tax (DST), Canada is no exception, although the action has generated a great deal of debate and dissent.
Canadian ministers reaffirmed their support for a cooperative, global strategy to levy taxes on the earnings of digital services on August 30, 2024. In a joint statement, the ministers said, “We have been clear that Canada’s provisional tax would be rescinded upon the entry into force of an acceptable multilateral measure.” Instead of enacting its own tax unilaterally, the statement emphasized Canada’s intention to conform to an international system. However, Canada felt forced to take separate action due to the protracted delays in creating a worldwide agreement through the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Both locally and internationally, a number of trade groups, corporate organizations, and others have criticized the DST. Critics contend that the tax may strain cross-border trade with important partners, like the United States, harm economic ties, and raise prices for Canadian consumers. The Canadian Chamber of Commerce has been outspoken in its objection, alerting Ottawa to the possible consequences of moving forward with the DST. The Chamber emphasized the potential for deteriorating trade ties and the potential for more financial strains on Canadian consumers and businesses.
The Canadian government proceeded with the tax in spite of the criticism, which has caused a great deal of opposition from major tech companies. Earlier in August 2024, Google announced that it would impose a 2.5% surcharge on advertisements that are displayed in Canada beginning in October 2024. Industry groups that represent Canadian advertisers have raised concerns that Google’s action could set a precedent, encouraging other tech companies to impose similar surcharges, further increasing costs for Canadian consumers and businesses.
Trade and technology organizations throughout the world have also criticized the Digital Services Tax. Major corporations, including Amazon, Apple, and Uber, are represented by the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA), which applauded the U.S. government’s decision to contest Canada’s DST under current trade agreements. Vice President of Digital Trade at CCIA Jonathan McHale stated he was certain the dispute resolution procedure would validate the DST’s violation of trade commitments. “The facts and the law will show that Canada should remove this measure expeditiously under [the trade agreement],” McHale stated in a press statement.
The Biden administration was also praised by the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI), which represents multinational tech corporations, for defending American businesses and workers. ITI’s senior director of tax and trade policy, Megan Funkhouser, emphasized the industry’s annoyance at Canada’s unilateral decision in spite of numerous stakeholder protests. Funkhouser urged U.S. authorities to take into account every option at their disposal as the matter’s talks proceed. “The Biden Administration’s action to defend American businesses and workers is greatly appreciated by industry, even though it is regrettable that Canada disregarded repeated requests from stakeholders to abandon its contentious measure,” she stated.
The DST dispute in Canada highlights the difficulties of implementing taxation in the digital economy. Although the goal of Canada’s unilateral moves is to achieve tax equity, they have drawn harsh criticism and caused strained relations with important trading partners and industry participants.
The Canadian Chamber of Commerce issued a statement on July 4, 2024, voicing serious concerns with the country’s purportedly discriminatory and retroactive Digital Services Tax (DST). The chamber contended that in addition to raising living expenses for Canadians, the tax may harm Canada’s relationship with the US, its biggest trade partner. The vice president of government relations for the chamber, Robin Guy, called on the Canadian government to change its unilateral decision, saying it was different from what its partners abroad were doing. Guy emphasized the necessity of working together with trading partners to create a multilateral solution that better serves Canadian interests rather than moving forward with the DST.
Business advocacy organizations are not the only ones that are worried about the DST. Peter Bethlenfalvy, the finance minister for Ontario, expressed disapproval as well and called for a halt to the tax’s introduction. Bethlenfalvy stressed the significance of tackling tax justice in the developing global digital economy in a letter dated June 28, 2024, addressed to Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland. He cautioned, nevertheless, that Canada must move carefully to prevent needless financial strains on people and companies. Additionally, he emphasized the danger of strained economic ties between the United States and Canada, which could partition off Canada from its biggest market.
In June 2024, the U.S. Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) firmly opposed the DST, adding to the growing resistance. The CCIA urged U.S. President Joe Biden to step in and start official dispute resolution proceedings under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) on behalf of large tech companies like Amazon, Apple, and Uber. According to the organization, the tax could cost American IT companies up to $2.3 billion a year, making it a serious threat to their operations. They also cautioned that the levy might result in the loss of thousands of full-time employment in the United States, increasing economic tensions between the two nations.
In light of the way that digital transformation is changing the global economy, the DST seeks to rectify alleged disparities in the taxation of international digital firms. However, some contend that the tax is discriminatory and retroactive since it unfairly targets American corporations. Additionally, the tax is said to be detrimental to attempts to establish a single worldwide framework through institutions such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). There have been several requests for Canada to postpone or reevaluate its strategy as a result of these worries.
The difficulties of controlling the global digital economy while preserving solid international economic ties are highlighted by the escalating dispute around the DST. A lot of stakeholders stress that in order to prevent economic consequences, collaboration and consensus are essential. With ramifications for global trade dynamics and tax policy in the digital era, the future of the DST continues to be a controversial topic as tensions increase, especially between the U.S. and Canada.
Taxpayers who may be impacted by the Digital Services Tax Act must actively be ready to comply with the new rules while the government considers whether to enforce it. If and when the Act takes effect, being prepared will be facilitated by taking early action. In light of this, we advise taxpayers to take the following actions to comply with the proposed regulations:
It is advisable for taxpayers to determine if the earnings they made in 2022 and 2023 fit into any of the four categories of in-scope DST revenue. These groups contain sources of income that are designated by the law as being taxable. In order to calculate tax liabilities under the Act, it is essential to comprehend how revenue fits into these categories.
To find out if the worldwide consolidated revenues for 2021 and 2022 satisfy the DST total revenue thresholds for 2022 and 2023, calculate them. An understanding of consolidated revenues is crucial for compliance since the threshold plays a significant role in deciding whether a taxpayer is liable to the DST.
Examine the combined income from in-scope revenue-generating operations related to Canadian users in 2022, 2023, and 2024. This computation will be needed to determine the taxable amounts under the DST framework. A better understanding of possible responsibilities will result from knowing the portion of income associated with Canadian activity.
Determine how much DST would be due in 2025 based on 2022, 2023, and 2024 income for planning and budgeting purposes. Organizations may use this estimate to better manage resources and comprehend how the DST will affect their bottom line.
Pay Attention to the Provisions for Implementation
Pay careful attention to any official pronouncements about the Act‘s provisions that will go into effect. Whether and when taxpayers must recognize an obligation for accounting reasons will be determined with the aid of timely updates. In order to ensure compliance and prevent any fines, it is essential to keep an eye on these trends.
In order to gather and arrange the data needed to compute Canadian Digital Services Revenue precisely, taxpayers should start putting strong systems in place. Setting up the required infrastructure would make compliance easier and guarantee accurate reporting in the event that the Act is implemented.
Take Advantage of Opportunities for Compliance Savings
There may be a planning opportunity for taxpayers who have been vigilant in monitoring pertinent data for 2022 and 2023 through a compliance-saving election. It may be beneficial to have correct records in place already, as this clause might reduce administrative responsibilities.
It is imperative that taxpayers who may be affected by the DST take a proactive stance by setting up procedures, monitoring revenue information, and projecting future obligations. Not only does early planning make compliance easier, but it also puts taxpayers in a position to seize strategic possibilities inside the regulatory system. If and when the new regulations are implemented, taxpayers can reduce risks, expedite compliance efforts, and successfully adjust to the changes by taking these suggested actions.
If a taxpayer meets both of the following consolidated group revenue thresholds, he or she may be liable for the Digital Services Tax (DST):
Global income Threshold: In a fiscal year that concluded in the preceding calendar year, the group’s total worldwide income from all sources must have reached at least €750 million.
Canadian Revenue Threshold: During the same time frame, the group’s revenue from digital services in Canada must surpass CA$20 million.
On the part of Canadian digital services revenue that exceeds CA$20 million in a given calendar year, the DST is applied as a 3% tax. Members of the combined group are each given a prorated share of this amount. The DST will not be due from taxpayers who earn more than the worldwide revenue level but have Canadian digital services income of CA$20 million or less. If they generate more than CA$10 million in income from Canadian digital services in a given year, they still have to meet their compliance requirements.
These conditions for compliance consist of:
DST registration: In order to ensure compliance with reporting requirements, entities that satisfy the revenue criteria must register for the tax.
Filing of Annual DST Return: Even in cases where there is no DST obligation, registered organizations are required to submit an annual return outlining their revenue from Canadian digital services.
This regulation makes sure that companies operating in Canada that make a sizable profit from digital services pay their fair share of taxes to the government. The thresholds are intended to minimize the impact on smaller participants in the digital economy while focusing on major multinational corporations.
Businesses operating within the impacted limits must ensure proper reporting and compliance since failure to do so may result in penalties or increased attention. This framework emphasizes Canada’s goal of encouraging good financial behaviour among multinational corporations while enforcing fair and transparent taxes on the digital economy targets major international corporations with the least amount of negative effect on smaller participants in the digital economy.
The primary source of revenue subject to the Digital Services Tax (DST) will be earnings received from Canadian sources together with certain digital services. Online marketplace platforms, social networking platforms, online advertising, and user data transactions are examples of these services. An extended description of the in-scope income types is provided below:
Online Marketplace Services: The revenue generated by digital platforms that let buyers and sellers transact is included in this category. Examples include websites that facilitate the trade of products, services, or lodging within Canada, such as e-commerce platforms and booking websites.
Online Advertising Services: Included in this category is revenue from digital advertising networks that target Canadian customers. This covers digital advertising services including sponsored adverts, banner ads, and others that are shown on websites, social media platforms, and search engines.
Social Media Services: This category includes revenue generated by the operations of social media sites that let Canadian users communicate, exchange content, and socialize. We examine monetization strategies such as paid subscriptions or ads that target these consumers.
Sale or Licensing of User Data: Income received from the sale or licensing of user data to third parties that comes from search engines, social media sites, or online marketplaces is subject to taxes. To be deemed within the scope, the data must be associated with Canadian users.
This system guarantees that money originating from major digital activities that are connected to Canadian users is taxed correctly.
The idea of “online marketplace services” and their taxation under the Digital Services Tax (DST) is critical for comprehending current digital economies. An online marketplace is described as a digital interface, such as a website or application, that allows people to engage and enable the trade of goods or services, including digital material. Crucially, this definition specifically excludes platforms that operate with a single provider or are meant solely to offer payment services, issue credit, or enable financial products. As a result, the DST does not apply to such sites.
Components of Online Marketplace Revenue
Revenue from online marketplace services includes various main sources, including:
Access and Usage Fees: These are subscription or pay-per-use costs that consumers must pay to access or utilize the marketplace.
Facilitation Fees: These are the earnings generated by facilitating interactions between users, such as transaction commissions and payment processing fees.
Premium and Enhancement Services: Online marketplaces may provide additional services such as premium memberships, prioritized listings, or other improvements to give users an advantage on the site.
Notably, earnings from auxiliary services such as storage and shipping are not included in the DST’s definition of online marketplace services revenue. However, this exception is only applicable if the costs for these services reflect a reasonable rate of remuneration that is consistent with market standards.
Revenue Attribution in Digital Services Tax Calculation
The Digital Services Tax is paid on revenue collected from Canadian consumers. To enable correct tax computations, precise criteria dictate how this money is attributed:
Physically Performed Services: Revenue from services physically performed in Canada, connected to real property in Canada, or associated with commodities situated in Canada is entirely generated from Canada.
Transaction-Based Fees: Revenue from transaction-specific fees, such as commissions, is distributed based on users’ geographic location:
Non-Transactional money: The DST Act establishes a unique mechanism for allocating money to Canada that is not related to specific transactions, such as general membership fees or advertising revenue. This model takes into account aspects such as user regional concentration and Canadian audience reach.
Implications and Broader Context
The Digital Services Tax focuses on income from online marketplace services in order to ensure equitable taxation of digital companies that profit from Canadian customers. The DST aims to strike a compromise between equal tax loads and the distinct character of digital marketplaces by defining particular income streams and attribution techniques. Businesses that operate online marketplaces must keep thorough records and utilize powerful technologies to correctly track user locations and income sources. This compliance assures DST compliance while preventing conflicts or fines.
Understanding the subtleties of the DST is critical for digital companies operating in Canada, as it provides clarity in a difficult but increasingly crucial area of international taxes.
The phrase “Canadian Online Advertising Services Revenue” describes the earnings made from particular kinds of online advertising activities that are either run in Canada or are aimed at Canadian consumers. Under the context of the Digital Services Tax (DST), these revenues are taxable. The purpose of the DST is to collect a share of the value created by digital interactions and activities that take place in Canadian digital marketplaces.
Revenue-generating Elements of Online Advertising Services
There are two main types of earnings from online advertising services:
Enabling the Distribution of Targeted Advertising
This category includes the revenue made by organizations that work to deliver online targeted advertisements using a digital interface. This comprises services or platforms that assist advertisers in reaching particular user demographics by using targeting mechanisms or data-driven algorithms.
Availability of Digital Space for Targeted Advertising
In addition, revenue from offering digital real estate or space for displaying customized advertisements is included. Rich media, sponsored content, banner advertisements, video commercials, and preferred placements are a few examples of advertising that is used to promote goods, services, or causes.
Online targeted advertisements: what are they?
Any promotional material that is positioned to appeal to a particular audience or demographic is referred to as an online targeted advertisement. This comprises, however, is not restricted to:
In the advertising sector, “targeted” refers to any strategy in which the placement of content is influenced by user behaviour, preferences, or demographic information.
Revenue Between Consolidated Group Members Is Not Included
Revenue from transactions between members of a consolidated group is specifically excluded from the computation of taxable online advertising revenue in order to prevent tax cascading and guarantee the fair application of the DST. This method guarantees that the DST only applies to income produced from external market-facing operations and avoids duplication of tax liability inside a company group.
Calculating the Revenue from Canadian Online Advertising Services
The geographic location of the end user who interacts with or is exposed to the advertisement determines how much money Canadian internet advertising providers make. Canada is liable for revenue if it is directly related to:
A pro-rata method is used to estimate the percentage of income supplied to Canada in cases where the revenue cannot be directly linked to a particular user’s activity or when the user’s location cannot be accurately ascertained. Based on pertinent data, including the distribution of targeted consumers or the overall number of impressions produced, this method allocates income proportionately.
Revenue originating from Canadian users must be appropriately allocated and reported by organizations that generate revenue from online advertising services in Canada. In order to ascertain user locations and interactions and maintain compliance with the DST framework, data analytics and tracking solutions are essential.
Revenue from targeted digital advertising activities aimed at Canadian users is precisely measured by Canadian online advertising services revenue. By implementing strong procedures to ascertain the origin and extent of this income, the DST guarantees an equitable share from digital advertising initiatives that capitalize on Canada’s online marketplaces.
Social media services revenue is defined as the revenue that is made from running a social media platform that facilitates user interactions or user-generated content interactions for the purposes of Canada’s Digital Services Tax (DST). This includes, but is not restricted to, the following sources of income:
Premium Services and Access: The revenue made by granting users access to the social media platform itself and any premium services that could be made available to them in exchange for better features or functionality.
Enabling User Interactions: Revenue generated by facilitating user-to-user or user-to-digital content interactions on the social media platform. This covers any service that assists in the sharing of information, communication, or interaction through user-posted, user-shared, or user-interacted material.
For DST reasons, some income streams are specifically not included in the category of social media services revenue. The following are some of these exclusions:
Revenue from Online Marketplaces: Revenue from social media services does not include revenue from online marketplaces, where buyers and sellers trade rather than interact with user-generated content.
Revenue from Online Advertising: This category does not include revenue from online advertising on the platform, especially when such advertisements do not directly support user-generated content or social interaction facilitation.
Consolidated Group Transactions: Since third-party users are not involved in these transactions, revenue resulting from interactions between members of the same corporate group or consolidated group is not taken into account for DST purposes.
Revenue from Proprietary Content: The social media platform’s earnings from digital providing users access to its own content—such as exclusive films, articles, or other media—are not included in the revenue model.
In particular, Canadian social media services income is the percentage of a taxpayer’s overall social media services revenue that can be attributed to Canadian users. A crucial component in evaluating the implementation of the Digital Services Tax, this income is established by taking into account the actions of Canadian users on the platform.
User data revenue, as defined by the Digital Services Tax (DST), is revenue generated by the sale or licensing of information gathered from users of digital platforms such as online search engines, social networking platforms, and marketplaces. This information may consist of a user’s preferences, billing information, personal information (such as name, postal address, and email address), or other identifying information.
Certain exemptions apply to a taxpayer or a member of its consolidated group. Under DST, money from the sale or licensing of data is not included in user data revenue if:
The revenue received from the sale or licensing of user data that may be linked to a specific Canadian user is referred to as Canadian user data income. Only revenue associated with identifiable Canadian consumers is subject to DST, thanks to this traceability requirement.
The percentage of users in Canada is used to calculate Canadian user data revenue in situations when user data is aggregated from several users, and it is not feasible to identify the location of the user or link the income to a particular user. For instance, 30% of the total revenue from such data would be regarded as Canadian user data revenue if 30% of the platform’s users are located in Canada.
This method aligns the DST obligation with the level of user engagement and data gathering in Canada, ensuring a clear and equitable computation of Canadian user data income.
The Digital Services Tax (DST) must be filed by June 30 of the year after the year that the taxable revenue is produced. In order to be eligible to pay the 3% Digital Services Tax, taxpayers who satisfy the designated DST levels must submit an annual tax return and pay any outstanding taxes by this date.
According to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), as soon as the Digital Services Tax Act formally takes effect, the administrative framework—which includes the necessary forms and comprehensive guidance—will be made accessible to facilitate DST compliance. In order to ensure that taxpayers meet their responsibilities in a timely and accurate way, these forms will be crucial for reporting taxable receipts and computing the DST due.
In order to comply with the DST, it is recommended that businesses become acquainted with the tax thresholds and reporting criteria specified in the upcoming law. The CRA will explain how to correctly disclose revenues that are subject to tax, claim any relevant exemptions or deductions, and determine the total amount owed.
Reviewing their internal financial reporting systems will help businesses affected by the DST get ready by ensuring they can efficiently collect and report taxable revenues. In order to navigate the new reporting requirements, proactive steps like speaking with tax lawyers or going to CRA informative workshops may be helpful.
It is crucial to report on time and accurately since failure to comply with the DST requirements or meet the June 30 deadline may result in fines or interest charges. The CRA encourages companies to keep informed and take the required actions to align their processes with the new tax framework when it issues more guidelines. This ensures adherence to the DST and a seamless incorporation of it into their financial processes.
DISCLAIMER: This article’s data is general in nature. It is only current as of the day it was uploaded. It may not be current because it hasn’t been updated. It is unreliable and does not provide legal counsel. Every tax situation is different from the examples given in the article since it is specific to its own set of circumstances. If you have any special legal questions, you should see a knowledgeable Canadian tax lawyer.
Stay informed with the latest legal developments @GLE News
Author
posted 3 days ago
posted 4 days ago
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
