Since 2010, the Global Law Experts annual awards have been celebrating excellence, innovation and performance across the legal communities from around the world.
posted 1 hour ago
Last reviewed: 17 June 2026
The rules governing equal pay for temporary workers in the Netherlands have undergone significant tightening, and 2026 marks the year employers and staffing agencies face real enforcement exposure. Under changes to the ABU and NBBU collective labour agreements (CLAs) that took effect on 1 January 2026, temporary agency workers must receive the same total remuneration package, including bonuses, allowances, and benefits, as comparable direct employees at the hirer’s organisation. This guide walks HR directors, general counsels, and staffing-agency compliance leads through the scope of the obligation, the key dates and transitional rules, a step-by-step compliance checklist, and worked calculation examples to help organisations close any remaining pay gaps before claims arise.
Equal pay for temps, in the Dutch context, means that a temporary agency worker placed at a hirer’s site must be compensated on the same terms as a comparable employee hired directly by that hirer for the same or equivalent role. The principle is not new, it is rooted in Article 8 of the Wet allocatie arbeidskrachten door intermediairs (Waadi) and reinforced by the EU Temporary Agency Work Directive, but the 2026 CLA revisions eliminate most of the exceptions that previously allowed agencies to deviate during the first phase of a placement.
A temporary agency worker (uitzendkracht) is someone employed by a temporary employment agency (uitzendbureau) and placed at a third-party hirer to perform work under the hirer’s supervision. The employment contract exists between the worker and the agency, but the work is carried out at and directed by the hirer. This triangular relationship is the defining feature. The definition covers workers engaged under both Phase A (the initial flexible period) and Phase B (the fixed-term contract phase) of the ABU CLA system, as well as workers placed through payroll companies that operate under the NBBU CLA.
The equal-pay obligation extends well beyond the base hourly wage. Under the revised ABU and NBBU CLAs, the following elements must match those of comparable direct hires:
Industry observers expect the inclusion of bonuses and one-off payments to generate the most compliance friction, because many hirers have historically excluded temps from discretionary bonus pools.
The equal-pay regime for temporary agency workers is distinct from, though overlapping with, the posted-workers framework. Workers posted to the Netherlands from another EU member state are entitled to the “hard core” terms of employment under the Wet arbeidsvoorwaarden gedetacheerde werknemers in de Europese Unie (WagwEU), which include minimum pay rates and working conditions. However, the agency-worker equal-pay obligation goes further by requiring full parity with comparable direct employees, not merely compliance with statutory minimums. Independent contractors (ZZP/zelfstandigen zonder personeel) fall outside the temporary-agency framework entirely, although misclassification risk remains a separate enforcement priority in 2026.
The equal-pay obligation for agency workers did not appear overnight. It has evolved through successive rounds of CLA negotiations, legislative amendments, and court decisions. What makes 2026 the critical compliance year is the removal of the so-called “dispensation” route and the narrowing of Phase A exemptions under the renewed ABU and NBBU CLAs.
| Rule / Development | Effective Date | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Waadi Article 8, statutory equal-treatment principle for agency workers | In force (longstanding) | Establishes the baseline right to equal treatment; allows deviation only via CLA |
| ABU CLA, Phase A remuneration system revised; equal-pay obligations tightened | 1 January 2026 | Agencies must apply hirer pay scales from day one of Phase A placements (previously allowed own pay scales for initial weeks) |
| NBBU CLA, aligned revisions to match ABU equal-pay standards | 1 January 2026 | Eliminates the competitive gap between ABU and NBBU agencies; uniform standard applies |
| Bonus and one-off payment parity confirmed | Effective under 2026 CLA cycle | Agencies must include bonuses, thirteenth month, and performance payments in the parity calculation |
| Proposed legislative reform, Wet verduidelijking beoordeling arbeidsrelaties en rechtsvermoeden (VBAR) | Expected 2026 (parliamentary process ongoing) | Broader labour-market reform package; may further restrict deviations and tighten enforcement |
The most significant change from an employment law perspective is the elimination of the extended Phase A pay-scale exemption. Previously, agencies applying the ABU CLA could use their own remuneration tables during the early weeks of a placement, delaying full pay parity. From 1 January 2026, the hirer’s remuneration must be applied from the first day of the assignment.
The 2026 CLA changes include limited transitional provisions for placements that were already in progress on 1 January 2026. Agencies that had existing Phase A workers on assignment before the effective date were generally permitted a short adjustment window, typically the remainder of the current pay period, to align remuneration with the new requirements. However, no open-ended grandfather clause applies: all placements must be fully compliant with the revised equal-pay standards as they enter a new pay period or contract extension.
Employers and agencies should note that the transitional rules do not exempt them from backpay exposure. Where a temporary worker can demonstrate that they were underpaid relative to a comparable direct employee during the transition window, the likely practical effect will be that the agency remains liable for the differential, even if it was technically within the grace period. Early indications suggest that unions and worker advocacy organisations intend to test the boundaries of transitional protections through litigation.
Staffing agency compliance is the primary obligation under the CLA framework: the agency, as the legal employer, bears the duty to ensure that the temporary worker receives equal pay. However, the hirer is not a passive bystander. The obligation structure works as follows:
The practical reality is that agency workers equal pay obligations create a shared compliance burden. Hirers who refuse to share remuneration data, or who provide incomplete information, risk contractual indemnity claims from their agency partners and, potentially, direct claims from workers under the Waadi.
Compliance with equal pay for temporary workers in the Netherlands requires coordinated action across HR, legal, payroll, and procurement functions. The following step-by-step checklist is designed for organisations that use temporary agency workers and for the agencies that supply them.
The first step is a thorough pay-equity audit covering all current temporary placements. Organisations should gather the following:
Once the audit reveals any gaps, contract updates must follow in two directions, the agreement with the staffing agency and any internal policies governing temporary worker terms:
Payroll system updates are frequently the most resource-intensive element of staffing agency compliance projects:
Inform all temporary workers in writing of any changes to their remuneration resulting from the equal-pay alignment. Brief line managers at hirer sites on the practical implications, including the requirement not to exclude temps from bonus or allowance schemes without a documented legal basis. Consider engaging works councils where the changes affect a significant portion of the workforce or alter existing policies on temporary labour.
To calculate equal pay for a temporary worker, agencies and hirers must compare the total employment conditions, not just the headline hourly rate. The following table illustrates the pay components that must be included in the equivalence calculation:
| Pay Component | Direct Hire (Comparable Role) | Temporary Worker (Current) | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross base hourly wage | €18.50 | €17.00 | Increase to €18.50 |
| Holiday allowance (8%) | €1.48/hr | €1.36/hr | Recalculate on new base |
| Shift premium (15% for evening shifts) | €2.78/hr (when applicable) | €2.55/hr | Align to hirer rate |
| Annual bonus (pro-rated) | €2,400/year (€1.15/hr equivalent) | €0 | Include pro-rated bonus |
| Travel allowance | €0.23/km | €0.21/km | Match hirer rate |
| Pension contribution (employer share) | Hirer scheme: 6% of gross | StiPP basic: lower rate | Monitor convergence timeline |
Worked example: A temporary warehouse operative works 36 hours per week, including 8 evening-shift hours. Under the hirer’s CLA, a comparable direct employee earns €18.50 base, receives a 15% evening premium, an 8% holiday allowance on all earnings, and a pro-rated annual bonus of €2,400. The agency must ensure the temp receives identical rates for each component. Where the agency previously paid a “blended” rate that folded some elements into the base wage, it must now unbundle each component and demonstrate line-by-line equivalence.
Industry observers expect that the element generating the most disputes will be the pro-rated bonus calculation, particularly where hirers apply discretionary performance criteria. The safest approach is to apply a formulaic pro-rata method (hours worked divided by full-time equivalent hours, multiplied by the standard bonus amount) unless the hirer can document objective, non-discriminatory reasons for a different assessment.
The following illustrative clause can be adapted for inclusion in agency framework agreements:
“The Agency warrants that it shall remunerate each Temporary Worker in accordance with the equal-pay provisions of Article 8 Waadi and the applicable CLA, ensuring that the total employment conditions, including but not limited to base wage, allowances, bonuses, holiday allowance, and working-hours arrangements, are no less favourable than those applicable to a comparable employee of the Hirer. The Agency shall indemnify the Hirer against any claim, loss, or expense arising from a breach of this warranty, save to the extent that the breach results from the Hirer’s failure to provide accurate remuneration data in accordance with Clause [X].”
“The Hirer shall, within 14 calendar days of each request by the Agency and within 14 days of any change to its CLA, pay scales, bonus structures, or allowance policies, provide the Agency with complete and accurate details of the remuneration applicable to comparable direct employees. The Agency shall have the right, upon reasonable notice, to audit the Hirer’s records to verify compliance with this obligation. Where the Hirer fails to provide timely or accurate data, the Hirer shall bear the financial consequences of any resulting underpayment to Temporary Workers.”
These clauses should be tailored to the specific commercial relationship and reviewed by qualified employment law practitioners in the Netherlands. The key principle is mutual accountability: the agency must pay correctly, and the hirer must supply the data that makes correct payment possible.
Temporary workers who believe they have been underpaid can pursue claims through the Dutch civil courts, typically via a subdistrict court (kantonrechter) wage-claim procedure. The statutory limitation period for wage claims is five years, meaning that backpay exposure can accumulate significantly. Trade unions, particularly FNV and CNV, have signalled increased attention to agency-worker pay parity and may bring collective actions on behalf of groups of affected workers.
For employers and agencies, practical mitigation strategies include maintaining thorough audit trails, using the contract clauses described above to allocate risk clearly, and engaging early with any worker complaints before they escalate to formal proceedings. Alternative dispute resolution, including mediation through sector bodies, can be faster and less costly than litigation. Where a claim does proceed to court, the burden of proof effectively shifts to the employer to demonstrate that the pay differential was justified.
| Entity | Key Obligation | Deadline / Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| Temporary employment agency | Ensure total employment conditions for temps equal those of comparable direct staff (including bonuses and allowances) | Ongoing from 1 January 2026; complete first full audit by end of Q2 2026 |
| Hirer (client company) | Provide accurate pay-scale, bonus, and benefits data to agency; allow audit access | Within 14 days of agency request and upon any CLA or pay-scale change |
| Payroll / Finance | Implement parity pay codes, produce auditable records, calculate equivalence for all active placements | System updates completed; records preserved for minimum 7 years |
| Legal / Compliance | Update agency framework agreements, insert equal-pay warranties, review indemnity provisions | Contract amendments executed before next renewal cycle or by end of Q3 2026 |
The 2026 equal-pay regime for temporary workers in the Netherlands leaves little room for delay. Agencies that have not yet aligned their pay structures to hirer conditions face mounting backpay exposure, and hirers that have not shared complete remuneration data with their agency partners are creating their own contractual liability. The steps to take now are clear: conduct the pay-equity audit, update agency and hirer contracts with equal-pay warranties and data-sharing obligations, reconfigure payroll systems to track line-by-line parity, and establish record-keeping practices that can withstand scrutiny.
Organisations that treat this as a box-ticking exercise risk costly claims; those that build genuine parity into their workforce strategy will find themselves better positioned to attract and retain temporary talent in an increasingly competitive Dutch labour market.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Nadia Adnani at Adnani & Van den Eeckhout Advocaten (AvdE), a member of the Global Law Experts network.
Member
No results available
posted 3 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.