Since 2010, the Global Law Experts annual awards have been celebrating excellence, innovation and performance across the legal communities from around the world.
posted 1 hour ago
Understanding how to acquire a company in Germany requires navigating a regulatory environment that has shifted materially in 2026, particularly for cross-border buyers. Germany’s consolidated FDI Screening Act now bundles previously fragmented investment-review rules into a single statute, creating new filing triggers that catch minority stakes as low as 10 per cent of voting rights in sensitive sectors. Simultaneously, proposed increases to merger control thresholds at the Bundeskartellamt are altering when, and whether, a transaction must be notified. This buyer playbook walks general counsel, corporate development teams and private-equity sponsors through every compliance decision from structuring to post-closing integration, with practical checklists for FDI screening Germany filings, merger notifications and works council obligations in M&A Germany transactions.
Before committing resources to any German target, buyers should map six critical decision points. Each one carries its own filing risk, timeline consequence and remedial exposure.
Key red flags for cross-border buyers:
The structural decision is the first compliance fork for anyone looking to buy a company in Germany. The choice between a share purchase, an asset purchase and, increasingly, the acquisition of a shelf GmbH determines which liabilities travel to the buyer, how employees are treated and which regulatory filings are triggered.
| Issue | Share purchase | Asset purchase |
|---|---|---|
| Liability transfer | Buyer inherits all historic liabilities embedded in the entity (tax, environmental, contractual) | Buyer can cherry-pick assets; seller retains most historic liabilities unless expressly assumed |
| Works council impact | Transfer of undertaking under § 613a BGB may apply automatically; early consultation required | Employee contracts transfer if an identifiable business unit moves; consultation still required under BetrVG |
| FDI / merger filings | Likely to trigger both FDI screening and merger notification if control or voting-rights thresholds are met | May still trigger filings if the transaction confers control over a business unit in a screened sector |
| Notarisation | Transfer of GmbH shares must be notarised (§ 15 GmbHG) | Individual asset transfers may not require notarisation unless real property is included |
| Tax profile | No VAT or real-estate transfer tax on the share transfer itself (subject to anti-avoidance rules) | VAT may apply to individual assets; real-estate transfer tax applies to property transfers |
Is it possible to buy a GmbH? Yes, and it is the most common acquisition structure in German mid-market M&A. The GmbH acquisition steps are straightforward in principle: the buyer and seller execute a share purchase agreement (SPA) before a German notary, who then files the change of ownership with the commercial register (Handelsregister). Registration typically takes two to four weeks after the notarised filing is submitted.
For buyers who need an immediate German vehicle, for example, to hold assets pending a larger carve-out, a shelf GmbH (Vorratsgesellschaft) can be purchased from specialised providers. Shelf companies are pre-incorporated entities with no trading history. The buyer acquires 100 per cent of the shares, appoints new management, renames the entity and begins operations. Notary and registration costs for a standard shelf-GmbH acquisition generally range from €1,500 to €3,500, excluding advisory fees. The minimum share capital for a GmbH remains €25,000, of which at least half must be paid up at incorporation.
FDI screening Germany is the single most consequential regulatory gate for non-EU buyers in 2026. Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK) now administers a consolidated FDI regime that replaces the previously scattered provisions of the Foreign Trade and Payments Act (AWG) and Foreign Trade and Payments Ordinance (AWV) with a unified Germany Investment Screening Act 2026. The practical effect for cross-border buyers is a broader scope of screened sectors, lower notification triggers and tighter timelines.
The consolidated act maintains two review tracks, a cross-sectoral review (applicable to any acquisition by a non-EU/EFTA buyer of 25 % or more voting rights) and a sector-specific review with lower thresholds for sensitive industries. The sector-specific track captures, among others:
| Sector category | Examples | Lowest voting-rights trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Defence and military equipment | Weapons manufacture, encryption technology, classified contracts | 10 % |
| Critical infrastructure | Energy, water, telecoms, data-centre operators, financial-market infrastructure | 10 % |
| Critical technologies | Artificial intelligence, robotics, semiconductors, quantum computing, cybersecurity | 20 % |
| Healthcare and pharmaceuticals | Vaccine production, PPE, hospital operators | 20 % |
| Media | Broadcasters, press outlets meeting reach thresholds | 25 % |
The graduated threshold system means that a buyer can trigger a mandatory filing obligation well before acquiring outright control. Industry observers expect the BMWK to scrutinise indirect acquisitions (through chain-of-entities structures) and to apply an “atypical control” test where contractual arrangements, such as veto rights over strategic decisions, confer influence equivalent to a shareholding above the applicable threshold. Buyers should map all voting rights, board-appointment rights and veto provisions in the target’s shareholders’ agreement against the relevant sector threshold before signing any term sheet.
Once a filing obligation is identified, the buyer must submit a notification to the BMWK. The ministry has two months to open a formal review after receiving a complete filing. If a formal review is opened, it must be completed within a further four months, extendable in complex cases. During the review period, the transaction may not close, the act imposes a statutory standstill. The BMWK may also impose interim measures such as appointing a trustee to exercise voting rights or restricting the buyer’s access to classified information held by the target.
Failure to file where required renders the transaction provisionally void. The ministry retains the power to prohibit a completed but unnotified acquisition retroactively, which can force an unwinding. The practical takeaway: map FDI screening obligations during the term-sheet stage and build the filing timeline into the SPA’s conditions-precedent schedule.
Independent of FDI screening, cross-border buyers must assess whether the transaction triggers a merger-control filing with the Bundeskartellamt (Federal Cartel Office). The merger control thresholds Germany framework operates on a turnover-based system.
Under the Act against Restraints of Competition (GWB), a concentration must be notified to the Bundeskartellamt where the combined aggregate worldwide turnover of all undertakings concerned exceeds €500 million, at least one undertaking has domestic (German) turnover exceeding €50 million, and at least one other undertaking has domestic turnover exceeding €17.5 million. Proposals circulating in 2026 contemplate raising the second domestic-turnover threshold from €17.5 million to a higher figure to reduce filings for smaller transactions. Industry observers expect these adjustments, if adopted, to take effect in the next amendment cycle of the GWB, potentially narrowing the filing obligation for mid-market deals.
The Bundeskartellamt operates a two-phase review. Phase I lasts one month from receipt of a complete notification. If concerns arise, the authority may open a Phase II investigation lasting up to four additional months (extendable by one month if remedies are offered). A statutory standstill obligation prohibits closing before clearance. Completing a notifiable transaction without prior clearance can result in fines and the transaction may be declared void.
| Jurisdiction | Combined turnover trigger | Individual-party domestic trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Germany (Bundeskartellamt) | €500 million (worldwide) | €50 million + €17.5 million (domestic) |
| EU (European Commission) | €5 billion (worldwide) | €250 million (EU-wide, each of at least two parties) |
| France (Autorité de la concurrence) | €150 million (worldwide) | €50 million (domestic, each of at least two parties) |
Buyers should note that a transaction may be notifiable in Germany even where it falls below EU thresholds, because the German domestic-turnover figures are significantly lower. Parallel filings in multiple jurisdictions are common in cross-border deals, and the timelines must be coordinated to avoid a closing-date mismatch.
Works council obligations in M&A Germany transactions are among the most underestimated deal risks for foreign buyers. The Betriebsverfassungsgesetz (BetrVG) grants works councils (Betriebsräte) extensive information and consultation rights that, if mishandled, can delay or derail post-signing integration.
Under §§ 111–113 BetrVG, the employer must inform the works council “in full and in good time” about any planned operational change (Betriebsänderung), a category that covers mergers, acquisitions, plant closures, material staffing reductions and fundamental changes to work organisation. The obligation arises when the decision is sufficiently concrete to be communicated, which in M&A practice typically means between signing and closing. Failing to consult before implementing changes can give rise to claims for a social plan (Sozialplan) and, in extreme cases, an injunction preventing integration steps.
Where an acquisition, whether structured as a share or asset deal, involves the transfer of an identifiable business unit, § 613a of the German Civil Code (BGB) mandates the automatic transfer of all employment contracts to the buyer. Employees must be notified in writing, and each employee retains a one-month objection right. If a buyer plans post-closing redundancies, the collective-redundancy notification requirements under the Kündigungsschutzgesetz (Protection Against Dismissal Act) apply, including mandatory notification to the local employment agency (Agentur für Arbeit) before any terminations take effect.
Experienced buyers address works-council risk through the transaction documentation itself. Warranties and indemnities should cover the seller’s compliance with works-council consultation obligations prior to closing. HR schedules attached to the SPA should list all employees, their contract terms, works-council agreements and pending disputes. Buyers can also negotiate a closing condition requiring the seller to deliver evidence that the works council has been properly informed.
Works council & employee risk checklist:
Foreign buyers should also note that German law does not restrict foreign nationals from establishing or managing companies in Germany. There is no citizenship or residency requirement for GmbH shareholders or managing directors, although at least one managing director must have an address within the European Economic Area for service-of-process purposes.
Due diligence Germany M&A follows a pattern familiar to cross-border practitioners, but several local specificities can catch foreign buyers off guard.
Virtual data rooms are standard in German M&A. Sellers typically populate the room with corporate documents, financial statements (HGB and, if available, IFRS), material contracts, employee lists (often anonymised until an advanced stage), insurance policies and litigation files. Buyers should insist on receiving certified copies of all Handelsregister extracts and shareholder lists, as these are the definitive evidence of share ownership.
The GmbH acquisition steps from signed term sheet to closing typically follow this sequence:
Most German SPAs condition closing on receipt of FDI clearance (or expiry of the review period without prohibition), merger-control clearance from the Bundeskartellamt, third-party and change-of-control consents under material contracts, and, increasingly, confirmation that works-council information obligations have been satisfied. Escrow arrangements or purchase-price holdbacks are common to cover warranty claims and pending tax assessments.
After closing, the buyer must register the new shareholder list with the Handelsregister, appoint or confirm managing directors and update beneficial-ownership filings with the Transparency Register (Transparenzregister). Where integration involves restructuring, site consolidation, headcount changes, systems migration, the buyer will need to negotiate a reconciliation-of-interests agreement and, where applicable, a social plan with the works council. Early engagement with the Betriebsrat at this stage significantly reduces the risk of injunctions and protracted negotiations that delay synergy realisation.
Coordinating three parallel regulatory and employee-relations workstreams is the defining challenge of any cross-border acquisition in Germany. The combined timeline below illustrates how FDI screening, merger control and works-council consultation interact with a typical deal schedule.
Indicative combined timeline:
| Target entity type | FDI filing trigger | Merger-control filing risk |
|---|---|---|
| GmbH operating in critical infrastructure | Mandatory at 10 % voting rights (sector-specific track) | Notifiable if combined/individual turnover thresholds met |
| GmbH in non-sensitive commercial sector | Cross-sectoral review at 25 % voting rights (non-EU/EFTA buyers) | Notifiable if combined/individual turnover thresholds met |
| AG (listed company) | Same sector thresholds apply; additional securities-law disclosure obligations | Notifiable; parallel BaFin/securities-law filings may be required |
| Asset/business-unit carve-out | May be caught if unit operates in screened sector and buyer acquires “control” | Notifiable if the acquired unit qualifies as a concentration and thresholds met |
Knowing how to acquire a company in Germany in 2026 means mastering three interlocking compliance gates, FDI screening, merger control and works-council engagement, while managing the structural and tax consequences of the chosen deal form. The consolidated Germany Investment Screening Act 2026 has broadened the reach of FDI review, proposed merger-control threshold adjustments may reshape filing obligations, and the BetrVG continues to grant works councils formidable information and consultation rights that can reshape deal timelines. Buyers who map these obligations at the term-sheet stage, build realistic clearance timelines into the SPA and engage experienced German counsel early will materially reduce execution risk and protect deal value.
This article provides general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Regulatory thresholds and legislative proposals referenced are current as of the date of publication and may change. Readers should consult qualified legal counsel for advice tailored to their specific transaction. Last reviewed: 11 June 2026.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Tim Schwarzburg at KUNZ.law, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 36 minutes ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 9 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.