Since 2010, the Global Law Experts annual awards have been celebrating excellence, innovation and performance across the legal communities from around the world.
posted 2 hours ago
Understanding how to do a tender offer in Vietnam is essential for any acquirer planning a significant stake in a Vietnamese public company. The Securities Law 2019 (Law No. 54/2019/QH14) and its implementing regulation, Decree No. 155/2020/ND-CP, set mandatory thresholds that trigger a public tender offer, prescribe the documents a bidder must file with the State Securities Commission (SSC), and impose strict minimum and maximum offer-period windows. With elevated public M&A activity and renewed SSC enforcement scrutiny in 2026, acquirers and their counsel need a clear, step-by-step compliance playbook rather than high-level summaries. This guide delivers exactly that: precise trigger thresholds, a bidder filing checklist, a deal-execution timeline, and a full map of exemptions and waivers available under current law.
A public tender offer in Vietnam is a regulated process through which a bidder offers to purchase shares from all shareholders of a listed or registered public company at a stated price for a defined period. Under Vietnamese law the process works as follows:
Industry observers note that, given heightened SSC enforcement in recent years, acquirers who treat the filing dossier as a formality risk delays and, in serious cases, administrative sanctions.
Vietnam’s tender-offer regime sits within a two-tier legislative structure. The Securities Law 2019, effective from 1 January 2021, establishes the core principles, who must make a tender offer, what triggers the obligation, and what exemptions apply. Decree No. 155/2020/ND-CP, issued by the Government on 31 December 2020, provides detailed implementation rules covering the filing dossier contents, offer-period mechanics, pricing, settlement, and SSC review procedures. Together, these instruments replaced the earlier Securities Law 2006 and Decree 58/2012 framework, introducing tighter concert-party rules and more granular filing requirements.
| Statute | Key provision | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Securities Law 2019 (Law No. 54/2019/QH14) | Articles 35–37, mandatory tender-offer triggers, exemptions, obligations of the bidder | Establishes the legal thresholds and the GMS waiver mechanism |
| Decree No. 155/2020/ND-CP | Articles 95–106, dossier contents, filing deadlines, offer-period rules, pricing, settlement | Provides the procedural detail that drives day-to-day compliance |
| SSC Circulars & guidance | Filing templates, sample forms, and SSC processing guidelines | Dictate the format of submissions and the SSC’s review timeline |
A mandatory tender offer in Vietnam is triggered whenever a transaction, or series of transactions, will cause a bidder (alone or together with concert parties) to cross specific ownership thresholds in a public company. The tender offer thresholds in Vietnam are set out in Article 35 of the Securities Law 2019, supplemented by the aggregation and calculation rules in Decree 155/2020.
The obligation to launch a public tender offer arises in three scenarios:
Worked example: Buyer currently holds 5% of Company X. Buyer proposes to purchase an additional 21% from existing shareholders, which would take total holdings to 26%. Because 26% exceeds the 25% threshold, Buyer must register a tender offer with the SSC before executing the purchase.
The mandatory tender offer obligation extends to indirect acquisitions. Where a foreign parent acquires control of a Vietnamese subsidiary that itself holds shares in a public company, the parent’s acquisition can trigger a tender-offer obligation if the subsidiary’s stake in the public company crosses the thresholds above. The SSC aggregates holdings across all related persons, defined broadly to include affiliates, controlling shareholders, and parties to a concert-party agreement, when measuring whether a threshold has been crossed. Early indications from recent SSC enforcement practice suggest the Commission is taking an increasingly expansive view of concert-party relationships, making pre-transaction mapping of related-person networks a critical due-diligence step.
The following bidder workflow sets out the practical steps to execute a public tender offer in Vietnam from initial planning through to settlement. Each step reflects the requirements of Decree 155/2020 and standard SSC practice.
Common pitfalls: Late or incomplete SSC filings that reset the seven-day review clock; failure to aggregate concert-party holdings at the threshold-calculation stage; omitting proof-of-funding documentation; and neglecting mandatory newspaper publication requirements.
The State Securities Commission filing for a tender offer comprises a prescribed registration dossier. Under Decree 155/2020, the dossier must contain the tender-offer registration statement, the bidder’s corporate resolution, audited financials, proof of funding, and a detailed disclosure of the bidder’s and its related persons’ existing holdings in the target. All documents must be in Vietnamese or accompanied by certified Vietnamese translations. The SSC accepts physical filing at its Hanoi office, with a copy submitted to the relevant stock exchange.
Beyond the initial registration, the bidder must notify the SSC and the stock exchange of any amendment to the offer terms (price increase, extension of period, change in conditions) at least seven working days before the amendment takes effect. After the offer closes, the bidder files a results report.
| Filing | When (relative to offer) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Tender-offer registration dossier | At least 7 working days before offer commencement | SSC may request supplemental information, resetting the clock |
| Media publication of offer | On the offer commencement date | National newspaper + stock-exchange website + target company website |
| Amendment notification (if any) | At least 7 working days before amendment takes effect | Re-publication in same media channels required |
| Results report | Within 10 days after offer completion | Filed with SSC and relevant stock exchange |
| Large-shareholding disclosure | Within 7 days of becoming a 5%+ holder (ongoing obligation) | Separate from tender-offer filings; triggered by post-offer holdings |
Decree 155/2020 establishes a mandatory minimum offer period of 30 days and a maximum of 60 days, measured from the official commencement date. “Days” in this context refer to calendar days, though the commencement date itself must be a trading day. The bidder selects the offer period within this range when preparing the registration dossier. Extensions are permissible provided the total period does not exceed 60 days, and the extension notice must be filed with the SSC and re-published at least seven working days before the original closing date.
For planning purposes, a typical tender offer timeline in Vietnam runs approximately 45 to 55 calendar days from SSC filing to settlement, once dossier-preparation time is included. Deal teams should build at least two additional weeks into the schedule for SSC queries and supplemental filings.
| Feature | Vietnam | United States (for comparison) |
|---|---|---|
| Filing/regulatory agency | State Securities Commission (SSC) | Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) |
| Minimum offer period | 30 calendar days | 20 business days |
| Maximum offer period | 60 calendar days | No statutory maximum (practice: extensions common) |
| Mandatory offer trigger | 25% of voting shares (with creeping bands above) | No mandatory-offer rule at federal level |
| GMS waiver available? | Yes, shareholders may waive by resolution | Not applicable (no mandatory-offer obligation to waive) |
Not every acquisition that crosses a threshold triggers a mandatory tender offer. The Securities Law 2019 and Decree 155/2020 provide several exemptions and one key waiver mechanism.
Under Article 35 of the Securities Law 2019, a general meeting of shareholders (GMS) of the target company may pass a resolution waiving the mandatory tender-offer requirement. The waiver resolution must be approved by shareholders representing at least 65% of the voting shares present at the meeting (excluding the votes of the proposed acquirer and its related persons). The practical effect is that the bidder negotiates a private acquisition with major shareholders, seeks the GMS waiver, and completes the transaction without launching a public offer. This path is common in friendly acquisitions where existing shareholders support the incoming buyer.
Bidders should approach structural avoidance strategies with caution. The SSC has the authority to look through arrangements that appear designed to circumvent mandatory tender-offer requirements, and administrative sanctions, including fines and forced unwinding of transactions, are available remedies.
| Entity type | SSC filing required? | Practical notes |
|---|---|---|
| Domestic acquirer (Vietnam entity) acquiring ≥25% | Yes, tender-offer dossier + announcement | Calculate pre- and post-transaction holdings including related parties |
| Foreign acquirer (non-Vietnam) acquiring ≥25% | Yes, tender-offer dossier + SSC clearance | Also check foreign-investment approvals if FDI-restricted sectors are involved |
| Indirect acquisition via private parent | Yes (if underlying public-company shares reach threshold) | SSC looks at economic ownership and concert-party rules |
The offer price must be no lower than the highest of: (a) the weighted-average market price of the target’s shares over the 60 trading days preceding the registration date; and (b) the price paid by the bidder or its related persons for shares of the target in the preceding 12 months (Decree 155/2020, Article 96). In practice, bidders commission independent valuations to support the pricing rationale, particularly for thinly traded stocks where the market-price benchmark may not reflect intrinsic value.
Proof of funding is a critical element of the SSC dossier. Most bidders use a bank confirmation letter from a Vietnamese or internationally recognised bank, confirming that funds sufficient to purchase the maximum number of shares sought are available or committed. Some bidders establish a dedicated escrow account to demonstrate funding certainty. If more shares are tendered than the bidder seeks to acquire, Decree 155/2020 requires pro-rata acceptance, each tendering shareholder receives the same proportional allocation, protecting minority shareholders from selective treatment. The SSC may also require the bidder to commit to purchasing all shares tendered if the offer is unconditional, further reinforcing minority protections.
Threshold check
Internal governance
SSC filings
Public announcements and settlement
Executing a tender offer in Vietnam demands precise compliance with SSC filing deadlines, accurate threshold calculations, and careful coordination with the target company’s board and the VSDC. The stakes are high: procedural errors can stall a transaction and expose the bidder to regulatory sanctions. For acquirers planning a public tender offer in Vietnam in 2026, knowing exactly how to do a tender offer, from dossier preparation to settlement, is the foundation of a successful deal. Experienced Vietnam M&A counsel can help navigate the SSC filing process, structure GMS waivers where appropriate, and manage the timeline to completion.
Bidders and their advisers can find a qualified Vietnam M&A lawyer through the Global Law Experts directory to obtain tailored guidance for their specific transaction.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Hien Truc Nguyen at VILAF, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
Member
No results available
posted 25 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.