Since 2010, the Global Law Experts annual awards have been celebrating excellence, innovation and performance across the legal communities from around the world.
posted 1 hour ago
Last updated: June 16, 2026
Understanding the VASP license Philippines requirements is the essential first step for any crypto exchange, custodial wallet provider or fintech platform that wants to operate lawfully in one of Southeast Asia’s fastest-growing digital-asset markets. The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) governs virtual-asset service providers through BSP Circular No. 1108, which sets out the definitions, eligibility criteria, anti-money-laundering obligations and Travel Rule thresholds that every applicant must satisfy. Complicating the picture is the BSP moratorium on new VASP licenses, first announced in 2022 and, as of mid-2026, still applicable with only narrow exceptions for BSP-supervised financial institutions.
This guide walks compliance teams, general counsel and founders through every requirement, from entity formation and capital evidence to ongoing AML reporting, and explains the realistic options that remain for market entry under the current regulatory framework.
For readers who need the headline verdict before the detail, here is the position as of June 2026:
BSP Circular No. 1108 defines a virtual-asset service provider as any person or entity that conducts one or more of the following activities as a business for or on behalf of another person:
| Covered activity | Typical operator examples | License required? |
|---|---|---|
| Exchange between virtual assets and fiat currencies | Crypto-to-peso exchanges, OTC desks | Yes |
| Exchange between one or more forms of virtual assets | Crypto-to-crypto trading platforms | Yes |
| Transfer of virtual assets | Remittance platforms, payment processors using VA rails | Yes |
| Safekeeping or administration of virtual assets (custody) | Custodial wallet providers, institutional custody services | Yes |
| Participation in and provision of financial services related to a virtual-asset offering or sale | Token launchpads, initial-coin-offering facilitators | Yes |
The definition mirrors the FATF’s international standard and captures on-shore activity, meaning any entity that targets Philippine customers or maintains operations within the country triggers BSP jurisdiction, regardless of where the platform is technically hosted. A VASP license from BSP takes the form of a Certificate of Authority (COA) to operate as a VASP or a registration as a remittance and transfer company with VASP functions, depending on the applicant’s corporate profile.
Any entity performing covered VASP activities in the Philippines must hold a BSP-issued COA before it can lawfully operate. The requirement extends to the following entity types:
Certain categories fall outside the licensing perimeter or enjoy partial exemptions. Purely non-custodial software (e.g., open-source wallet interfaces that never hold private keys) is generally not treated as a VASP, although BSP retains discretion to re-classify activities that effectively amount to custodial control. BSP-supervised banks and quasi-banks that wish to add VASP functions are processed through the existing supervisory framework and may fall within the exceptions to the moratorium discussed below.
A foreign crypto platform that actively solicits Philippine-resident customers, through peso-denominated trading pairs, local payment-gateway integrations or targeted marketing, is treated as conducting covered activities within BSP’s jurisdiction. The practical effect is that an unlicensed offshore operator risks enforcement action and cannot legally on-board Philippine users. Where direct licensing is blocked by the moratorium, foreign operators must explore partnership or technology-service arrangements with an already-licensed VASP or a BSP-supervised institution.
The BSP announced a moratorium on the processing and grant of new VASP Certificates of Authority effective September 1, 2022. The stated rationale was to allow the central bank to assess the risks posed by the rapid growth of virtual-asset activity and to strengthen its supervisory capacity. As of June 2026, BSP has not published a formal notice lifting the moratorium, and the likely practical effect is that most standalone applicants cannot obtain a fresh COA.
| Date | Event | Practical impact |
|---|---|---|
| August 2022 | BSP announces moratorium, effective September 1, 2022 | No new COA applications accepted from standalone entities |
| 2022–2025 | BSP periodically reviews moratorium; no public lifting notice issued | Existing VASPs continue to operate; new entrants blocked except through exemption pathways |
| Mid-2026 (current) | Moratorium remains in effect; BSP-supervised institutions may still apply under existing supervisory frameworks | Banks and quasi-banks with VASP ambitions represent the primary exception |
Early indications suggest that the narrow exceptions to the BSP moratorium on VASP licensing cover:
Any entity considering an application in 2026 should engage Philippine legal counsel to confirm the current moratorium status directly with BSP before incurring formation and compliance costs.
For applicants who qualify, whether because the moratorium is lifted or they fall within an exception, BSP Circular No. 1108 and related guidance set out the following baseline requirements for the VASP application process in the Philippines:
Industry practitioners and BSP guidance indicate that the following documents are typically required when filing a VASP COA application:
The application timeline varies significantly. Industry sources report a typical processing window of six to twelve months from complete submission to COA grant, though delays are common when BSP requests additional documentation or site inspections. Application fees are assessed on a case-by-case basis; applicants should budget for both BSP filing fees and the professional costs of preparing compliance documentation.
Unlike some jurisdictions that prescribe a fixed statutory minimum capital, BSP evaluates VASP capital requirements on a case-by-case basis, considering the nature, scale and complexity of the proposed activities. This approach gives the central bank broad discretion, and it means applicants cannot rely on a single published figure as the definitive threshold.
Accepted forms of capital evidence include:
| Entity type | Typical capital evidence | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Retail crypto exchange | Bank certification, audited financial statements, proof of liquidity | Industry commentary reports assessed thresholds ranging up to PHP 100 million; actual figures depend on transaction volumes and product scope |
| Custodial wallet provider | Higher capital scrutiny; insurance or segregated reserves often required | BSP may require additional ring-fencing of client assets |
| Supervised bank acting as VASP | Bank prudential capital rules (regulated separately under BSP banking circulars) | Capital adequacy assessed under existing banking-supervision framework; VASP-specific add-ons may apply |
The PHP 100 million figure frequently cited in industry commentary should be treated with caution, it reflects market reporting rather than a hard regulatory floor. Applicants should engage legal counsel to obtain a preliminary assessment from BSP before committing capital.
The Travel Rule for crypto in the Philippines is one of the most operationally demanding requirements for licensed VASPs. Consistent with the FATF Recommendation 16 framework adopted by BSP through Circular No. 1108 and related AML guidance, VASPs must transmit specific originator and beneficiary data when processing virtual-asset transfers that meet or exceed PHP 50,000.
For qualifying transfers, the originating VASP must collect and transmit the following information to the beneficiary VASP:
The beneficiary VASP is required to verify this information before making the transferred value available to the recipient. Where the required data is missing or incomplete, the receiving VASP must determine whether to reject, suspend or proceed with the transfer under a risk-based approach, and must file a suspicious-transaction report (STR) where the circumstances warrant.
| Obligation | Licensed VASP (exchange) | Custodial wallet provider | Supervised bank acting as VASP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Travel Rule (transfers ≥ PHP 50,000) | Full compliance required | Applies where transfer/fiat threshold is met | Bank AML regime applies; coordination with BSP |
| Suspicious-transaction reports (STRs) | Filed with AMLC within prescribed timelines | Same | Filed through existing bank reporting channels |
| Covered-transaction reports (CTRs) | Required for transactions exceeding PHP 500,000 (or equivalent) | Same | Same |
| Record retention | Minimum five years from date of transaction | Same | Same (subject to longer banking record-retention rules where applicable) |
| Privacy-coin restrictions | BSP guidance discourages support for privacy coins; platforms must assess and mitigate AML risks | Same | Same |
Privacy coins, virtual assets with built-in anonymity features that obscure transaction trails, present heightened risk under BSP’s framework. Licensed VASPs that choose to list such assets must demonstrate that their transaction-monitoring tools can adequately de-anonymise or flag suspicious activity, failing which BSP may require delisting.
Even where the moratorium prevents immediate filing, building a compliance-ready posture positions an applicant to submit rapidly once the moratorium lifts or an exception is secured. The following phased timeline reflects common industry practice:
For operators who cannot obtain a standalone VASP license under current conditions, several alternative strategies may allow a lawful presence in the Philippine market, each carrying its own legal risks that demand careful analysis:
None of these alternatives removes the need for Philippine legal analysis. Each must be stress-tested against BSP’s current position and the evolving enforcement posture of the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC).
Whether you are assessing eligibility under a moratorium exception, preparing a compliance-ready corporate structure for future application, or evaluating alternative market-entry strategies, early legal engagement significantly reduces the risk of regulatory missteps. A Philippines-focused regulatory lawyer can:
To connect with a Philippines-based business and regulatory compliance lawyer, visit the Global Law Experts lawyer directory.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Joseph James Joaquino Jr at AJA Law (Alcantara Joaquino Alcantara Law), a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 7 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.