Since 2010, the Global Law Experts annual awards have been celebrating excellence, innovation and performance across the legal communities from around the world.
posted 3 hours ago
Investors and lenders operating in Serbia are no longer treating environmental, social and governance factors as a soft preference, they are building ESG investor expectations into corporate governance assessments for Serbian companies before committing capital. At NCR lawyers, we regularly advise boards and in-house counsel on the practical governance changes and disclosure steps needed to satisfy these demands without creating unnecessary cost or delay. This guide sets out the specific actions Serbian companies should take now: adopt board-level ESG oversight, prepare a minimal disclosure pack and align transactional documentation with the questions investors will ask. The commercial payoff is direct, companies that address these points early secure faster deal timelines, better lending terms and stronger negotiating positions.
Serbian boards that fail to demonstrate basic ESG governance risk losing access to capital, facing prolonged due diligence and accepting less favourable deal terms. The good news is that the most impactful changes are low-cost and fast to implement. In my experience, boards that commit to three governance actions, three disclosure quick-wins and two transactional preparations can close the gap with investor expectations within 90 days.
Three immediate board actions:
Three disclosure quick-wins:
Two transactional benefits:
International investors and development finance institutions entering Serbia evaluate ESG through four lenses: regulatory risk, reputational exposure, supply-chain continuity and alignment with their own portfolio-level ESG commitments. From what I am seeing in practice, even domestic lenders are now incorporating basic ESG checklists into credit assessments, particularly for exposures above EUR 5 million.
The core concern for investors is not whether a company has a glossy sustainability report, it is whether the company can demonstrate that someone at board level is accountable for ESG risks and that basic policies and data exist. Investor expectations in Serbia now typically include evidence of the following:
The Western Balkans ESG Foundation has noted the rapid growth in ESG-linked investment across the region, underscoring that the trend is structural rather than cyclical. Companies that present this evidence proactively, rather than waiting to be asked, signal maturity and reduce deal friction.
A typical ESG due diligence request list from an international investor or development bank entering Serbia includes the following items:
In my experience, companies that can produce items one through eight within 48 hours of a request dramatically improve investor confidence and accelerate deal timetables.
Serbia does not yet have a single, comprehensive ESG reporting statute equivalent to the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. However, several domestic laws and institutional requirements already create ESG-adjacent obligations, and EU accession alignment is progressively tightening the framework. Serbian companies must comply with environmental laws covering waste management, air and water protection, and emissions, obligations that the EU accession process is steadily reinforcing.
Key domestic obligations with ESG relevance include:
Enforcement of ESG-related obligations in Serbia is distributed across several bodies. The APR handles company filings and beneficial ownership. The Securities Commission oversees issuer disclosure and market conduct. The Ministry of Environmental Protection supervises environmental permits and inspections. Labour inspectorates enforce employment and safety standards. For companies with cross-border operations, all of these touchpoints become relevant simultaneously during investor due diligence.
The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards, developed by EFRAG, create obligations that reach Serbian companies through two channels. First, Serbian subsidiaries of EU parent companies may be consolidated into group-level CSRD reports, requiring them to supply standardised ESG data upstream. Second, the CSRD’s third-country undertaking provisions may apply directly to Serbian companies generating significant net turnover in the EU.
As the Chambers Corporate Governance 2025 guide for Serbia notes, ESG regulations have mandated that Serbian companies seeking access to the European market comply with these evolving standards. Even where direct CSRD obligations do not yet apply, EU buyers and lenders routinely impose equivalent data requirements through contract and loan terms. In my view, Serbian companies with any EU commercial exposure should treat ESRS-aligned disclosure as a practical necessity rather than a future compliance item.
Boards that integrate ESG into existing governance structures, rather than creating parallel reporting streams, achieve compliance at lower cost and with less organisational disruption. The following changes address the most common gaps I encounter when advising Serbian companies on investor-readiness.
Board-level ESG mandate. Assign explicit ESG oversight responsibility to the supervisory board, an existing audit or risk committee, or a newly designated sustainability committee. The mandate should be recorded in the board charter or committee terms of reference and should specify the scope of oversight, reporting frequency and authority to commission external assessments.
Standing agenda item. Add ESG as a quarterly standing item on board meeting agendas. Minute the discussion, including any decisions taken, risks identified and management actions assigned. Investors reviewing board minutes look for evidence of substantive engagement, not just a tick-box reference.
Risk register integration. Expand the company’s risk register to include ESG categories, environmental liability, regulatory change, supply-chain disruption, workforce retention, reputational risk and governance gaps. Assign risk owners and review triggers.
Director duties awareness. Ensure all directors understand that ESG oversight falls within their existing fiduciary duties under Serbian corporate law. Board responsibilities for ESG in Serbia are not a separate legal obligation, they are an extension of the duty to act in the company’s best interest with due care.
Remuneration alignment. Where executive remuneration includes variable components, consider linking a portion to measurable ESG targets, safety incident rates, emissions reduction or governance milestones. This signals to investors that management incentives are aligned with sustainability outcomes.
Sample board resolution language:
“The Board resolves to assign oversight of environmental, social and governance matters to [the Audit Committee / a designated Board member], with a mandate to review ESG risks quarterly, approve the company’s ESG policy, and report to the full Board on compliance status, material incidents and recommended actions. This mandate is effective immediately and shall be reflected in the updated Board Charter.”
Board meeting ESG checklist:
The single most effective step a Serbian company can take before engaging with investors or lenders is to assemble a minimal ESG disclosure pack. This is not a sustainability report, it is a focused collection of documents that answers the questions investors will ask in the first round of due diligence. In our experience at NCR lawyers, companies that have this pack ready shave weeks off transaction timelines.
| Document | Purpose | Where to store / link |
|---|---|---|
| ESG policy (2–3 pages) | Demonstrates board-level commitment and scope of ESG governance | Company website, data room, board portal |
| One-page KPI dashboard | Provides quantitative evidence of ESG performance over time | Data room, quarterly board pack |
| Compliance confirmation letter | Board-signed statement confirming current status of environmental permits and labour compliance | Data room, lender compliance file |
| Environmental permits register | Lists all permits held, expiry dates and most recent inspection outcomes | Legal department register, data room |
| Supplier code of conduct | Shows supply-chain ESG expectations are formalised | Procurement system, company website |
| Basic materiality statement | Identifies which ESG topics are most relevant to the company’s operations and sector | Board pack, data room |
Sample KPI dashboard fields (quarterly refresh):
Companies often assume this requires expensive consultants or new software. In practice, most of this data already exists within finance, HR and operations teams, it simply needs to be consolidated into a single, regularly updated document. The cost of doing this is negligible; the cost of not doing it is measured in delayed closings and higher risk premiums.
When preparing for M&A or a fundraising round, Serbian companies should anticipate that ESG will feature prominently in buyer or investor due diligence. Based on recent transactions I have advised on, the following checklist covers the areas most likely to generate questions, negotiation points or deal friction.
Pre-transaction actions:
My advice to clients is to run an internal ESG pre-diligence exercise at least three months before any planned transaction. Discovering an issue internally is always preferable to having it surfaced by a buyer’s advisers.
Investor ESG expectations vary by sector. Serbian companies in the following industries should focus their disclosure efforts on the highest-risk areas:
The following roadmap prioritises actions by time horizon and cost, recognising that most Serbian companies are starting from a low base of formal ESG disclosure.
Months 1–3 (low cost, high impact):
Months 4–6 (moderate effort):
Months 7–12 (strategic investment):
For companies looking to connect with corporate law specialists or legal advisers in Serbia, early engagement helps tailor the roadmap to the company’s specific sector, ownership structure and transaction pipeline.
| Entity type | Likely reporting / obligation signal | Practical steps for compliance |
|---|---|---|
| Listed companies / issuers (Serbia) | Higher disclosure expectations from the Securities Commission and investors; may face ESRS/CSRD spillover if the issuer is active on EU markets | Board oversight, publish ESG policy, track KPIs, ensure filings with APR and stock exchange, prepare an assurance plan |
| Large non-listed companies (revenue / employee thresholds) | Indirect obligations via supply chain and lenders; voluntary reporting increasingly expected | Materiality assessment, one-page dashboard for lenders, supplier due diligence |
| SMEs / suppliers | Mostly voluntary but increasingly requested by buyers and lenders | Adopt core policies (anti-bribery, environmental basics), collect supply-chain data, use standard templates |
For specialist advice on this topic, contact Nemanja Curcic at NCR lawyers.
Author
No results available
posted 6 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.